Newsweek April 3, 2006 issue - The Supreme Court this week will hear arguments in a big case: whether to allow the Bush administration to try Guantánamo detainees in special military tribunals with limited rights for the accused. But Justice Antonin Scalia has already spoken his mind about some of the issues in the matter. During an unpublicized March 8 talk at the University of Freiburg in Switzerland, Scalia dismissed the idea that the detainees have rights under the U.S. Constitution or international conventions, adding he was "astounded" at the "hypocritical" reaction in Europe to Gitmo. "War is war, and it has never been the case that when you captured a combatant you have to give them a jury trial in your civil courts," he says on a tape of the talk reviewed by NEWSWEEK. "Give me a break." Challenged by one audience member about whether the Gitmo detainees don't have protections under the Geneva or human-rights conventions, Scalia shot back: "If he was captured by my army on a battlefield, that is where he belongs. I had a son on that battlefield and they were shooting at my son and I'm not about to give this man who was captured in a war a full jury trial. I mean it's crazy." Scalia was apparently referring to his son Matthew, who served with the U.S. Army in Iraq. Scalia did say, though, that he was concerned "there may be no end to this war."
Posted by marga at March 26, 2006 01:21 PM | TrackBackWhy the world is reacting against war prisoners detained at Guantanamo's Bay. In 1994 with cubans rafters exode none talked about that and for at least one year there were in that place families, single women and ancients living in worst conditions which only improve few months beforeto leave that place. But we wanted to live in USA not fought against them that is why all of you were not interested about our luck
Posted by: Ana at June 3, 2006 10:01 AMWho cares about guantanamo's detained rigths when our rights as workers are not respected by companies owners in the Human Rights Championship country and the media is protecting their intereses because of the money of this companies? None in the world is free, that is the biggest lie of our lives, to believe in freedom. Not even the power is free. The only freedom is knowledgment and this is not accesible to all
Posted by: ana at June 3, 2006 10:13 AM